<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Renewables Replace Fossil Fuels?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getreallist.com/can-renewables-replace-fossil-fuels.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getreallist.com/can-renewables-replace-fossil-fuels.html</link>
	<description>Deal With Reality or It Will Deal With You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.getreallist.com/can-renewables-replace-fossil-fuels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getreallist.com/?p=1389#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>@Justin: Your point is well taken. However I do believe distributed PV is one of the easiest paths we can take: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getreallist.com/seven-paths-to-our-energy-future.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Seven Paths to Our Energy Future&lt;/a&gt;. I have designed many solar systems in northern California that produced 100% of the home&#039;s electricity. It works, and it&#039;s easy to deploy. This really isn&#039;t a question of choosing one fuel source to entirely replace all the others. There are no silver bullets, but PV is one &quot;silver bb.&quot; 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getreallist.com/utility-scale-solar-heating-up.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Utility scale CSP&lt;/a&gt; offers the potential for 24-hour uptime. I also believe that V2G technology and residential/commercial distributed storage (batteries, flywheels, compressed air, hydrogen, etc.) could eventually solve the intermittency problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Justin: Your point is well taken. However I do believe distributed PV is one of the easiest paths we can take: <a href="http://www.getreallist.com/seven-paths-to-our-energy-future.html" rel="nofollow">Seven Paths to Our Energy Future</a>. I have designed many solar systems in northern California that produced 100% of the home&#8217;s electricity. It works, and it&#8217;s easy to deploy. This really isn&#8217;t a question of choosing one fuel source to entirely replace all the others. There are no silver bullets, but PV is one &#8220;silver bb.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.getreallist.com/utility-scale-solar-heating-up.html" rel="nofollow">Utility scale CSP</a> offers the potential for 24-hour uptime. I also believe that V2G technology and residential/commercial distributed storage (batteries, flywheels, compressed air, hydrogen, etc.) could eventually solve the intermittency problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.getreallist.com/can-renewables-replace-fossil-fuels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getreallist.com/?p=1389#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>EROI aside, most talk I&#039;ve seen about solar energy replacing coal and nuclear energy completely fails to incorporate the concept of production capacity. 

A nuclear fission plant runs about 95% of the given hours in a year, a coal plant between 70% and 90%, a PV solar panel between 10% and 16%.

In the Southeast US, only about 4-5 hours a day are suitable for generating the peak amount of power out of any given solar system, in the Southwest US its about 5-6 hours a day... An average residential system might be in the range of 3.5-4kWpeak and installed in Arizona would generate only 20kWh a day. Since the average US household uses around 12,000 kWh/year, efficiency is clearly the way to go. If we could get average household energy usage down in the 3500 kWh/year range, renewables might be useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EROI aside, most talk I&#8217;ve seen about solar energy replacing coal and nuclear energy completely fails to incorporate the concept of production capacity. </p>
<p>A nuclear fission plant runs about 95% of the given hours in a year, a coal plant between 70% and 90%, a PV solar panel between 10% and 16%.</p>
<p>In the Southeast US, only about 4-5 hours a day are suitable for generating the peak amount of power out of any given solar system, in the Southwest US its about 5-6 hours a day&#8230; An average residential system might be in the range of 3.5-4kWpeak and installed in Arizona would generate only 20kWh a day. Since the average US household uses around 12,000 kWh/year, efficiency is clearly the way to go. If we could get average household energy usage down in the 3500 kWh/year range, renewables might be useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mika.</title>
		<link>http://www.getreallist.com/can-renewables-replace-fossil-fuels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1674</link>
		<dc:creator>mika.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getreallist.com/?p=1389#comment-1674</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t need economic &quot;growth&quot;, we need economic wealth. We need to abolish the FED, get rid of the IRS, and claw back the extreme legal, political, and economic privileges usurped by the corporatist mafia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t need economic &#8220;growth&#8221;, we need economic wealth. We need to abolish the FED, get rid of the IRS, and claw back the extreme legal, political, and economic privileges usurped by the corporatist mafia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.getreallist.com/can-renewables-replace-fossil-fuels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getreallist.com/?p=1389#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>So investments in efficiency will have an accelerated payback after ~2013. Unless the cost of those investments increases in lock-step with the cost of energy, in which case we&#039;re back where we started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So investments in efficiency will have an accelerated payback after ~2013. Unless the cost of those investments increases in lock-step with the cost of energy, in which case we&#8217;re back where we started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
