<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peak Oil Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getreallist.com/peak-oil-update.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getreallist.com/peak-oil-update.html</link>
	<description>Deal With Reality or It Will Deal With You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Baylink</title>
		<link>http://www.getreallist.com/peak-oil-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Baylink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getreallist.com/?p=1307#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>You may well be right on the money in everything you write... but I have as much trouble with &quot;peak oil denier&quot; as I do with &quot;global warming denier&quot;.

The word, in the context you&#039;re using it, is obviously a callback to &quot;holocaust denier&quot;.  But the Holocaust is an established historical fact... not a theory, however sound.

You can call people &quot;global warming deniers&quot; when you&#039;re standing on a 50% smaller United States in 2075... but it&#039;s pretty much the height of hubris to use the term now, and I think you might want to re-evaluate it; it puts a major dent in your credibility.  At least to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may well be right on the money in everything you write&#8230; but I have as much trouble with &#8220;peak oil denier&#8221; as I do with &#8220;global warming denier&#8221;.</p>
<p>The word, in the context you&#8217;re using it, is obviously a callback to &#8220;holocaust denier&#8221;.  But the Holocaust is an established historical fact&#8230; not a theory, however sound.</p>
<p>You can call people &#8220;global warming deniers&#8221; when you&#8217;re standing on a 50% smaller United States in 2075&#8230; but it&#8217;s pretty much the height of hubris to use the term now, and I think you might want to re-evaluate it; it puts a major dent in your credibility.  At least to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
