New interview on Yahoo Finance "Tech Ticker" show

July 29, 2008 at 3:37 am
Contributed by: Chris

As I alerted you a few days ago, I did a video interview yesterday with Aaron Task for the Yahoo Finance “Tech Ticker” show, at their studio in Times Square. Check it out…and if you want a good laugh, read the comments threads!

Part 1: ‘Sky’s the Limit’ for Crude, says Peak Oil Advocate: Buy Drillers, Avoid Majors

Part 2: No Relief from $120 Oil Anytime Soon — or Ever, says Energy Expert

Part 3: The End Is Nigh: Peak Oil Proponent Forecasts Grim Future

Two great thinkers talk about population, energy and the future

July 26, 2008 at 1:07 am
Contributed by: Chris

Gotta bring these two pieces on population to your attention, because they’re so good, and I have a huge respect for these guys. If you’re able to stomach a solid, unvarnished, scientific perspective on everything, check these guys out. Basically, I agree with every word of both. Unfortunately, selling this message, as critical as it is, seems nigh impossible. If you have any ideas, I’m all ears…
First, a recent interview with famed environmentalist Paul Erlich, who wrote The Population Bomb. Watch the video.

Second, this recent screed (below) from Dr. Albert Bartlett, who’s standard lecture on population I have referenced many times…In my opinion, it should be a required part of every high school curriculum.

–CPublished in the Teachers Clearinghouse for Science and Society Education Newsletter

Vol. 27, No. 2, Spring 2008, Pg. 21

(more…)

Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Three?

July 26, 2008 at 12:53 am
Contributed by: Chris

In this week’s Energy and Capital, I offer my perspective on the Plug-In 2008 Conference, devoted to plug-in and electric cars. There were some exciting visions in play, and a couple of interesting vehicles. In particular I liked badboybuggies.com.
I’ll be traveling next week, and doing a podcast on Monday morning on my friend Aaron Task’s Tech Ticker show at Yahoo Finance, check it out. Live from Times Square…then off to brainstorm some new ideas on how to deal with peak oil.

–C

(more…)

Shadowboxing the Apocalypse

July 16, 2008 at 5:01 am
Contributed by: Chris

In this week’s column for Energy and Capital, I review the crippled state of the financial markets, and address another load of horrible ideas out of Washington D.C. for how to deal with the energy crisis.

(more…)

Guest Appearance on The Atomic Show

July 16, 2008 at 4:04 am
Contributed by:

I did a 45-minute telephone interview for a podcaster/blogger this week. The interviewer is a strong proponent of nuclear power, and was disappointed with my coverage of nuclear power in the book, but on most other points about the greater energy challenge, we agreed.

You can listen to it here: Atomic Show #098 - Chris Nelder, Co-Author of Profit from the Peak

Peak Oil Confusion - A Game Whose Time Is Up

July 9, 2008 at 8:12 am
Contributed by: Chris

In this week’s Energy and Capital column, I take Investor’s Business Daily to task for their recent editorial on peak oil.

–C

(more…)

Guest Editorial: "Energy Stocks: The Only Way to Make Any Money"

July 9, 2008 at 8:06 am
Contributed by:

Here is a new guest editorial I wrote for the Wealth Management Exchange site. Original here

Energy Stocks: The Only Way to Make Any Money

By Chris Nelder,
author of Profit from the Peak - The End of Oil and the Greatest Investment Event of the Century

The game has changed. It’s time to throw out the old investing playbook.

Index funds, diversified portfolios, momentum trading strategies, even technical chart analysis are more likely to lose you money than increase it in the coming years.

The reason for this heretical position: peak oil.

The concept of peak oil is simple: Oil production rates generally follow an irregular bell-curve shape. It is simply the nature of petroleum extraction that it ramps up to a peak or short plateau, and then declines. This observation has been made in thousands of oil fields (and oil producing nations) worldwide, and is named “Hubbert’s Peak” in honor of the geologist who first described it, Dr. M. King Hubbert.

Peak oil is not about “running out of oil,” it’s about the peak rate of oil production. It’s not the size of the tank which matters, but the size of the tap.

Living Within A Shrinking Energy Budget

When the production rate of oil reaches its maximum and begins to decline, the world’s economies will be forced to live within a shrinking, not expanding, energy budget. The economic impact of peaking oil production is what concerns us, not the amount of oil yet to produce. We won’t be “running out of oil” for at least 100 years or more, but it will be produced at ever-declining rates.

Right now, the world is producing oil at the rate of about 86 million barrels per day (mbpd), a rate which has been essentially flat since 2005. While geopolitical factors have certainly played a role, the most significant reason that oil production has now plateaued, after decades of steady growth, is the depletion of mature fields.

A majority of the world’s best and largest oil fields have reached maturity, and are either already in decline, or soon will be. In the aggregate, the world’s background depletion rate owing to these mature fields is now about 4.5% per year. Therefore, the world has to manage about 3.8 mbpd of new oil production each year just to keep the global production rate flat-equivalent to finding a new China, or a new Mexico, each year. In order to actually increase global oil production by 1 mbpd a year to meet projected demand, we would have to find the equivalent of a new Iran every year.

After taking into account the significant new oil projects that should come online within the next decade, and the likely pace of depletion and demand, many experts on peak oil believe that we are essentially already at the peak of global oil production. Within the next three to five years, the world will likely reach the end of the plateau at the peak, and go into terminal oil production decline.

Demand Increasing Where Oil Is Subsidized

Although oil production has stagnated, demand for oil has not. Gasoline over $4 a gallon has dampened demand in the U.S., but demand is still increasing in the red-hot economies of the Middle East, China and India, where gasoline and diesel are subsidized. As a result, global demand continues to increase by about 1 mbpd each year.

This imbalance in supply and demand is the primary reason why oil prices keep going higher. Speculation, as everyone from the Department of Energy to the Treasury to oil traders has said, is not really a factor. Even Warren Buffett agrees: “In my lifetime, up until the last year or two, there’s been a huge amount of excess supply available,” he said. “We don’t have excess capacity in the world anymore, and that’s why you’re seeing these oil prices.”

What we are seeing now is simply the market trying to place an appropriate value on a barrel of incredibly useful, energy dense, finite, and diminishing oil.

Oil and the Economy

We have already seen the economic damage caused by oil prices shooting up 40% in the first half of 2008. It has resulted in inflation across the board, because energy is used to make and transport everything. This is particularly true for food: One oft-quoted estimate is that for every calorie of food that comes to your table, it took 10 calories of fossil fuel inputs to grow it, process it, store it, and deliver it to you.

Ironically, the U.S. mandate to produce 36 billion gallons of biofuel a year by 2022 has only exacerbated rising food costs, as food competes with fuel for a limited supply of corn and other feedstocks.

Oil has also reflected the declining value of the dollar, since oil is primarily traded in U.S. dollars worldwide. The decline of the dollar, the sub-prime crisis and an economy on the ropes (in part due to spiking energy costs) has created a vicious cycle. As more and more of one’s income is eaten up by the basic needs of food and energy, it leads to further dependency on credit, which increases the likelihood of credit and mortgage default, which further hurts the financial sector, taking down the broader markets and putting the economy in an increasingly worse position.

Perhaps that is why government economists have cleverly created the Consumer Price Index, or CPI, which specifically excludes food and energy, and thus makes the “core” economy sound healthier than it really is.

At the same time, the loss of discretionary income reduces spending, making economic recovery even more difficult. It’s a classic case of “stagflation.”

Barring a very severe, global recession or depression (which may be inevitable anyway), these problems are bound to get worse. Prices for everything will have to keep going up as long as oil prices do. Prices for grid power will also have to keep going up, because higher prices and faltering supplies of oil put further pressure on coal, natural gas, and nuclear power.

In fact, switching from oil to other traditional fuels might not work at all, and could make our problems even worse.

In my book, Profit from the Peak, I studied all major forms of energy: oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, biofuels, all renewables, efficiency, the works. In order to determine what the true potential of each fuel is, I examined their relative sizes, their potentials and peaking profiles, and their investing angles.

My research indicates that we are likely at the peak of oil right about now (2008-2010), and that we’ll reach peak natural gas around 2010-2020, peak coal around 2020-2030, and peak nuclear by roughly 2025. All of the sources I consulted are public information, yet few observers seem to have realized that we may be looking at peak energy within the next 17 years!

As for unconventional sources of hydrocarbons, such as tar sands and oil shale, and the currently off-limits reserves of the continental shelf and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, they cannot materially affect the basic supply curve of oil. My research suggests that all of the above put together might produce 5 to 6 mpbd at peak, 10 to 20 years from now, but they will only slightly offset the global depletion that will have occurred by then, making a slight bump on the back side of the production curve.

The Impact On Investment

The enormous challenges facing energy production have fundamentally changed the investing game. An uncertain supply outlook combined with a remarkably inelastic demand for energy has driven a stake into the heart of neoclassic economic theory. It appears that this time, things really are different. This time, the Invisible Hand of the market is going to stay in its Invisible Lap, and provide nothing but a diminishing supply and higher prices. It is now an empirical fact that record high oil prices have failed to bring adequate new supply to market.

This is why oil and commodity prices stubbornly refuse to revert back to the mean, as a technical chart analysis says they should.

This is also why a typical broad and “safe” investing strategy based on index funds and diversified portfolios would have delivered somewhere between a zero return and a 15% loss so far this year.

In fact, I believe that commodities, and in particular energy, are really the only sectors that stand to gain as we go deeper into the energy crisis.

This view was echoed in a CNBC interview on May 29 with Matthew Simmons, one of the world’s top energy investment bankers. “I have a very significant portfolio that I’ve built up over the last 25-30 years in energy stocks,” he said, “because I think it’s the only way that anyone’s going to make any money.”

His thesis-and ours-has been well supported by the market. While almost every other sector has been harshly beaten down over the past year or so, energy shares have been going off like a rocket.

After all, the flip side of crisis is opportunity. This is not only the greatest challenge the world has ever seen; it is also the greatest investment opportunity.

Energy: The Investment Opportunity of a Lifetime

The answer to the energy crisis is painfully simple: Reduce demand, and increase supply.

There are hundreds of outstanding investment opportunities in the companies that are focused on providing the solutions we need. I suggested dozens of them in my book, but I also endeavored to equip my readers with a deeper understanding of the whole picture, so that they can find the opportunities that most appeal to them.

For those who like the traditional energy business, there are plenty of excellent plays. Transocean (RIG), the largest offshore drilling rig provider in the world, is a real blue chip investment in oil production, up 44% over the last year. Companies like Chesapeake Energy (CHK) and Southwestern Energy (SWN) are in hot pursuit of natural gas, and are up about 70% YTD. Coal companies like Arch Coal (ACI) and Peabody Energy (BTU) are on fire, up 67% and 43% on the year, respectively.

The renewable energy business is even more exciting. Solar companies like First Solar (FSLR) and Canadian Solar (CSIQ) have tripled or quadrupled over the last year alone. Diversified solar, battery and fuel cell company Energy Conversion Devices (ENER) is up 139% in the last year. Wind turbine manufacturer like Vestas Wind Systems (Denmark: VWS) and Western Wind Energy (Canada: WND) have doubled and tripled, respectively, over the last year.

After wind and solar, however, are potentially even more exciting renewable energy technologies like geothermal power, and marine energy technologies that seek to derive power from waves and tides. The size of these resources is positively vast, many times greater than the total energy the world consumes every day. But unlike wind and solar, which have a solid 30 year history of investment in research and development and real-world trials behind them, geothermal and marine energy are really just getting started. Although both types have been in commercial use since the 1960s, such as The Geysers geothermal plant in California and the Rance River tidal barrage generator in France, a new generation of technologies promises to deliver clean geothermal and marine power in thousands of new locations around the world.

In addition, there are entire new areas of opportunity:

  • Transforming our infrastructures to run on electricity instead of liquid fuels
  • Making everything more efficient, from cars to homes to appliances.
  • Rebuilding the electric grid to be beefier, more distributed, more agile, more tunable, and more resilient.
  • Creating new ways of storing energy, from the micro (batteries) to the macro (overnight thermal storage for concentrating solar plants).
  • Implementing carbon control protocols and carbon capture mechanisms.

Each of these sectors has numerous plays, from big solutions like publicly traded hybrid car manufacturers, to small ones like privately funded grid control devices.

The growth potential for renewable energy, and the associated technologies of the future, seems nearly limitless. After decades of investment and research into renewable energy, it currently accounts for only about 1% of the global energy mix, but by the end of the century, it will have to be closer to 100%.

With a clear understanding of the impending energy crisis, and a realistic grasp of our options going forward, investing in energy and other commodities is a no-brainer. The game has changed, and those who realize it now have an opportunity to jump on the greatest investment event of the century.

Announcing a Peak Oil Media Guide

July 9, 2008 at 7:46 am
Contributed by: Chris

In order to address some of the confusion about energy in the media, I have developed a new “Peak Oil Media Guide.” I have invited all knowledgeable experts to provide comments and informed criticism, and have already received some good input. I hope it will be a “living document” that evolves over time, with widescale collaboration, and be useful to those of us who address the media.

It was originally announced and published by the Association for the Study of Peak Oil - USA, here: Announcing a Peak Oil Media Guide.

For those who prefer a Word doc format, you can download it here: Peak Oil Media Guide (Word format). However this version may not be kept up to date.

The main points of the Guide (without the charts) are summarized below.

–C

Peak Oil Media Guide Summary

As those who understand peak oil are no doubt aware, coverage of the issue in the media has been extremely uneven. Some observers cite the best available data and production models, which indicate that there are perhaps 1.2 trillion barrels of economically recoverable conventional oil yet to produce. But a few seem intent on promoting an optimistic industry view (despite historical evidence to the contrary) that one day, the world can recover most of the estimated 12 trillion barrels of original oil in place—a factor of 10 variance in estimates!

Such a wide range of expert opinion has only served to confuse the public at a time when it is critically important that they get up to speed on the simple facts of oil production and understand what they might realistically expect in the future. In an effort to close this enormous gap, I have collaborated with Steve Andrews, a co-founder of ASPO-USA, on a new “Peak Oil Media Guide,” to address the important questions that regularly come up about peak oil. We encourage those who engage with the media to distribute the guide. It is my hope that the guide will become a “living document” which can be updated and enhanced as time goes on by knowledgeable experts. We welcome their input. For now, please send comments to Chris Nelder at chris [dot] nelder [at] gmail [dot] com and include “PO Media Guide” in the subject line. You can find the full document here (pdf).

Here is an abbreviated summary of the Guide’s key points (first edition).

It’s not the size of the tank which matters, but the size of the tap.

Peak oil is not about “running out of oil,” it’s about the peak rate of oil production. It’s not the size of the tank which matters, but the size of the tap. This is an essential concept. Talking only about the number of barrels of oil that might exist somewhere, without also talking about the rate at which that oil can be produced, and when, entirely misses the target.

We are now at, or “close enough” to the peak.

Right now, the world is producing between 86 and 87 million barrels per day (mbpd) of oil, and that rate has changed little since 2005. Our analysis suggests that world production is unlikely to ever exceed 90 mbpd, and might not increase much above where it now stands. It appears we are now on the oil peak/plateau, or close enough to it that the date of the technical, absolute peak doesn’t matter. Within the next three to six years, as the world goes into terminal oil production decline, it will be forced to live within an ever-decreasing supply of oil. Not only are we “close enough” to the peak, we’re far too close to it. According to the June 2008 revision of Colin Campbell’s model for world oil production, the global peak is this year, 2008.

Oil production in the U.S. is well past its peak, and is in long term decline.

U.S. oil production has been in decline for most of the last 38 years. This is not due to politics; it is simply the nature of petroleum extraction. The U.S. uses about 20+ mbpd of petroleum, and produces about 7 of that. The other two-thirds are imported, and there is no possible way that the U.S. could produce that amount domestically, no matter where or how quickly we drilled.

Oil shale: the fuel of the future…and it always will be.

After decades of fully authorized, commercial, even subsidized attempts to develop oil shale into a usable liquid fuel, no one has ever been able to make it economically feasible. Even if oil shale extraction does become economically viable some day, it’s unlikely to ever produce more than a modest flow (though perhaps a very long-lived one) of extremely expensive synthetic oil.

ANWR and the continental shelf are no panacea.

We believe that if all limits on domestic drilling were removed, including those on ANWR and the outer continental shelf, it could only increase U.S. oil production by 2 mbpd at best, and would require several decades to reach that level. Once that production comes online, it will be a drop in the barrel compared to the loss in global oil production. The idea that we can somehow drill our way to independence from imported oil is, therefore, misleading in the extreme. The only way we could become energy independent soon is by severely curtailing our oil demand.

Oil prices aren’t all about us.

It’s an all-too-common belief that if only we had authorized more domestic development of oil, our gasoline prices would be lower. With the global supply and demand balance as tight as it is for oil, natural gas, and coal, it is highly unlikely that a slight increase in U.S. production could make any noticeable difference in our gasoline prices. Once we take into account the decades it will take to bring new domestic resources online, any additional production we can manage will only slightly nudge the decline curve in global oil production, and only slightly depress domestic prices for gasoline, for a short while.

Decline rates are relentless.

Decline rates are also frequently misunderstood. The concept is simple: Oil production first must make up for the decline rate of mature fields before any net additional oil can be counted. It’s like pouring water into a bucket with a hole in it. Anyone familiar with a balance sheet should understand this concept, but many observers routinely miss it. World oil production must first struggle against a background decline rate of 4.5% or higher from mature fields before it can manage any increases. Currently, the net increase in global oil production is about 1% per year.

Expectations for the future are shrinking.

Peak oil deniers often like to point to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) past estimates, which have projected that world oil production would rise from 86 mbpd today to as much as 130 mbpd in the future. However, the IEA’s estimates have been shrinking for the last several years, when it became clear that world net oil production had stopped growing. The old 130 mbpd estimate was reduced to 115 mbpd, and will soon be reduced again to 100 mbpd in a report to be released later this year.

Improved technology cannot move the peak.

The potential of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques is well known, after over four decades of experience in the field. What that experience has shown is that (with a few minor exceptions) improved technology cannot move the peak. What it does is increase, over time, the overall amount of oil that can be produced. On the bell curve, it thickens and lengthens the tail. But it does not change the point in time at which production peaks.

Chris Nelder is a self-taught energy expert who has written hundreds of articles on peak oil and energy in general. His new book on investing in energy, Profit from the Peak , has received positive reviews from investors and the peak oil community. He is a frequent contributor to Energy and Capital.

A New Paradigm

July 2, 2008 at 5:44 am
Contributed by:

Folks,

In this week’s article for Energy and Capital, I contend that while most of the economy still has a long way to fall, energy and commodities will yield standout gains.

Stay tuned for more guest editorials coming up in the next week.

–C

A New Paradigm

Energy & Commodities: The Only Way to Make Money

2008-07-02
By Chris Nelder

It was a wicked, wretched June for the Dow, which posted its worst performance for the month since the Great Depression.

Oil prices setting record high after record high, while the dollar sinks ever lower, have put the hurts on the whole economy—except for commodities and energy, which are the only two asset classes I have promoted in these pages.

It’s not that I’m a genius investor or anything—I assure you, I’m not. All I do is read the writing on the wall, and tell you what I think. It’s a surprisingly rare thing to do among Wall Street pundits, who seem to prefer the safety of historical patterns and chart analysis to actually looking around them.

So you have to look past the talk about how all those beaten down stocks in tech, retail, and luxury items are good buys.

They sure are: Good bye house, good bye car…

What we have here is a new paradigm. It’s time to throw out the old investing playbook and make a new one.

Rather than being safe ways to play the market, index funds, diversified portfolios, momentum trading strategies, and technical chart analysis are now more likely to lose you money than increase it.

Want some proof? Here are the top-performing diversified U.S. stock-fund categories, according to MarketWatch:

Category

Q2 Avg. Return

YTD Avg. Return

Midcap Growth

5.2%

- 8.3%

Small-Cap Growth

4.2

- 11.3

Midcap Core

4.1

- 6.0

Multicap Growth

2.0

- 10.5

Large-Cap Growth

1.8

- 10.0

U.S. Diversified

0.6

- 9.7

Yes, that’s right, the top performing stock funds are down 6-11% on the year. As for the major averages, they’re down 12-14% this year.

A typical Wall Street pundit, trying to paint a happy face on an abysmal market, might write up the headline as "Funds beat the indexes in 2008!"

But that’s not the kind of gruel we serve around here.

A Perfect Storm

Regular readers of my column know the real score: We’ve got a perfect storm on our hands.

As more and more of one’s income is eaten up by the basic needs of food and energy, it leads to further dependency on credit, which increases the likelihood of credit and mortgage default, which further hurts the financial sector, taking down the broader markets and putting the economy in an increasingly worse position.

Oil prices are causing inflation across the board, from food to everyday goods, and by "inflation" I mean prices for everything going up, not some geeky Austrian-school definition of it.

Part of the reason oil keeps going up (apart from simple supply and demand) is that the Fed has devalued the dollar in order to stave off a financial crisis resulting from the subprime meltdown. But if the Fed tries to prop up the dollar now, and raise rates, it could bring an already-down economy to a standstill. So by averting a crisis of confidence in the banks, they brought on a crisis of stagflation for the entire economy. As the old saying goes, if the only tool you have is a hammer, the whole world looks like a nail.

The fact is, the Fed is whistling past the graveyard. Or sticking their finger in a leaky dike. Or whatever metaphor you like.

While most investors are shaking their heads in confusion and dismay over a recession that just won’t go away, it all makes perfect sense to those who really understand the implications of peak oil.

I hold a very simple thesis: Without an ever-growing supply of cheap and plentiful energy, the old investing strategies simply don’t work anymore, because the markets don’t behave as they should.

In fact, record high oil prices have clearly failed to bring adequate new supply to market. Consequently, oil and commodity prices stubbornly refuse to revert back to the mean, as a technical analysis says they should.

A Very Nasty Period

The trends should be clear enough to anybody who reads the news.

Transportation is on the ropes. The Big Three automakers are posting huge losses after being asleep at the wheel for years, continuing to pin their futures on big trucks and SUVs even as global oil production flattened out and the peak oil story started to unfold. Now new and used car dealerships are saddled with row upon row of gas guzzlers nobody wants, and American-made vehicles with European fuel economy are nowhere to be found. It’s no surprise to me that Chrysler just shut down an assembly plant, and I expect more bad news yet from the American automakers.

The airline sector is going down in flames, with fuel prices destroying the bottom line. (See my article of last month, "Peak Oil and the Rail Revolution - Say Goodbye to Cheap Air Travel.")

Truckers are trying to strike their way out of losses due to skyrocketing fuel costs, but if they can’t pass on the higher cost of their fuel to the buyers of the goods they haul, which is hard to do in a declining economy, then they’re going to simply run out of road.

The financial sector is down 20% on the year, and it ain’t over yet, not even hardly. Hedge fund manager John Paulson believes that we’re only $360 billion of the way through a $1.3 trillion writedown from the credit crisis.

Oh, yes. The subprime mess was just the beginning. Now we’re getting into the option ARM resets, where borrowers have a choice about how much to pay off each month. Merrill Lynch estimates that the losses from option ARMs could add another $100 billion to the $400 billion in mortgage and subprime related losses. And after that, we’ll likely see another wave of personal credit defaults, leading to yet another fat writedown for the banks.

On June 18, the credit strategist for the Royal Bank of Scotland said, "A very nasty period is soon to be upon us - be prepared," and warned that the S&P 500 could tank to 1050 by September—a 28% drop since the beginning of the year. That means that all of the gains made by the index’s component companies since the end of 2003 would be wiped out.

Retail, luxury goods, tech, travel, entertainment…all in the dumper. Want a good way to hedge against recession? Pick the weak companies in any of those sectors, and short them.

Yesterday, the Dollar Thrifty car rental company blamed its poor 2008 performance on "tough operating conditions" as if this were some unexpected, nasty bump in the road, but I call it an entirely predictable result of peak oil.

Likewise, it should have been no surprise to anyone who’s paying attention when Starbucks announced that it will close 600 stores, cut 12,000 jobs, and halve its expansion plans. When people can’t afford to fill their tanks just to get to work, a $4 cup of frothed coffee-flavored milk just doesn’t rank on the priority list.

But energy and commodities? Ahh…now there’s a different story.

Energy Stocks: The Only Way to Make Any Money

In a CNBC interview on May 29, Matthew Simmons, one of the world’s top energy investment bankers and a proponent of the peak oil study, explained his investing strategy. "I have a very significant portfolio that I’ve built up over the last 25-30 years in energy stocks," he said, "because I think it’s the only way that anyone’s going to make any money."

I couldn’t agree more.

The investing game has changed, and those who realize it now have an opportunity to jump on the greatest investment event of the century. The growth potential for renewable energy in particular, and the associated technologies of the future, seems nearly limitless. After decades of investment and research into renewable energy, it currently accounts for only about 1% of the global energy mix, but by the end of the century, it will have to be closer to 100%.

We should expect prices for our most basic of needs, food and energy, to continue to rise until the supply and demand equations are back into balance. And it looks to me like that will be achieved mainly by demand destruction, which could take years to play out. This bear is going nowhere.

Meanwhile, energy and commodities, including agricultural commodity ETFs, are doing very well this year even as the rest of the market goes south. (For my previous recommendations in these sectors, see the Related Articles section at the bottom.) Along with traditional safe havens like gold and silver, bonds, T-bills and the like, they’re really the only place to be right now.

But if you want to do really well, then you need to have a stake in some of the choice energy picks we have selected for the $20 Trillion Report.

Until next time,

Chris

ZDNet interview with Harry Fuller

July 2, 2008 at 5:36 am
Contributed by: Chris

Folks,

I was interviewed this week by veteran newsman Harry Fuller on ZDNet (a part of CNET), and am reposting his article. The original is here.

(more…)


Page 1 of 11


Copyright © 2008 GetRealList
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
FAIR USE NOTICE