Tar Sands: The Oil Junkie’s Last Fix, Part 1

August 24, 2007 at 11:16 am
Contributed by:

Folks,

I have done a fairly comprehensive high-level analysis of the tar sands, which is going out in two parts because it’s a bit long. You can see the first part here: Energy and Capital. I will post the whole thing to GRL when the second part goes out next week.

And with that, I’m off to Burning Man for the week. This year the theme is “Green Man,” with a focus on renewable energy, sustainability and all things green, so it should be interesting! Hopefully I’ll get some good material for future articles out of it.

Have a great Labor Day Weekend everybody!

–C

Interviewed by CNBC

August 24, 2007 at 9:45 am
Contributed by:

Folks,

I was interviewed by a CNBC journalist about the markets a week ago, but wasn’t able to find the article until today. I was quoted in it along with other investing pundits. Here is the article.

–C

Commodities Stocks Still A Good Bet Despite Market Swoon

By Peter Kang
CNBC.com
| 17 Aug 2007 | 05:56 PM ET

Credit concerns around the globe have left few sectors untouched by a recent flight to quality, and this holds true for commodities-related stocks, which have seen outsized losses relative to the broader market as investors have been quick to book profits after hefty advances.

“As these highly leveraged hedge funds have had to sell stuff out into the market, they’ve had to sell their best stuff,” says Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial. “That’s really important because it means these are good companies with good cash on their balance sheets, they’ve got good prospects for profit going forward and they’re a buying opportunity more than ever.”

Fundamentals don’t change overnight or over a few weeks, assert market analysts, and now could be the right time to start building positions in some of the best-performing sectors of the last two years. There’s some concern, however, that this market event may be different, given the uncertainty regarding the extreme leverage used by some hedge funds and even big banks such as Goldman Sachs .

Commodities Boom or Bust?

“We still believe that we’re in a period of globalization and industrialization that’s taking place on an unprecedented scale and that’s going to be positive for commodities and raw materials going forward,” says Brian Hicks, co-portfolio manager at U.S. Global Investors.

“We’ve been tested several times during this bull market cycle where we’ve seen 10% to 20% corrections but we’ve rebounded every time.”

Donald Coxe of BMO Financial says companies in the energy sector, base metal producers, precious metals miners, and food companies focusing on grain should continue to benefit from a long-term bull market for commodities.

“Invest in scarcity rather than what’s created on Wall Street’s computers,” says Coxe.

William Rutherford, president of Rutherford Investment Management, says he remains steadfast in his positive outlook on energy stocks, which have been a long-term portion of his holdings for quite some time.

“I like energy services in particular because with all the money the energy companies are making they need more reserves, they need more exploration and they need to service what they have,” Rutherford says.

Steel And Coal

Leo Larkin, a metals industry analyst at Standard & Poor’s, says steel stocks are beginning to look cheap and highlighted such players as AK Steel, U.S. Steel, Nucor, Posco and Steel Dynamics.

“I would be putting cash to work in those stocks,” he says. There’s less vulnerability in the steel stocks.”

U.S. Steel and Nucor look cheap on a valuation basis, he says, and are currently valued at less than nine times the cash held on their balance sheets, while Carpenter Technology, a specialty play on metals technology, is selling at just four times the cash on its balance sheet.

For copper producers and other base metals-focused companies, says Larkin, it may be a little too early. Southern Peru Copper and Freeport-McMoRan have both seen declines of more than 20% since hitting new all-time highs on July 23.

“I think copper has been a little bit overextended this entire year,” he said. “Demand is up in China but it’s been down in the U.S. and demand will not recover meaningfully until 2009.”

Brian Kabot, a trader with Sun Capital Partners, likes coal companies and is focusing on Alpha Natural Resources , the largest U.S. exporter of metallurgical coal.

“If you’re bullish on the global steel cycle and near-term energy needs, Alpha Natural Resources trades at 60% of its net asset value which is a significant discount to its peers and they have the top management in the industry,” said Kabot. “So that’s one place we’re putting our money.”

“The coal producers themselves are getting hammered but there is indiscriminate selling going on in the markets with the subprime,” said Chris Nelder, senior analyst at investment newsletter Energy and Capital.

Quality energy names such as Peabody Energy , Valero Energy, Transocean, Tesoro , Diamond Offshore Drilling, and XTO Energy, says Nelder, have “all been whacked pretty good.”

“All those guys have great opportunities ahead of them,” Nelder said. They are certainly on sale right now but the market is so sketchy right now. Essentially, the bottom line is that the tide of speculative money flowed in and flowed out.”

Nelder says he remains “very bullish” on offshore drillers such as Transocean and Diamond Offshore but wild market swings have made it a difficult area to invest in.

“It’s like catch the falling knife out there, it’s just really tough right now,” he says. “In this environment with the enormous influence of hedge fund money in the energy complex, they will get bid up and down and it has nothing to do with them so it’s just hard to invest.”

Nelder says he has whittled down his portfolio recently and currently owns just three stocks: Valero , Raser Technologies , a geothermal electricity play, and SulphCo , which says it has developed a way to cheaply remove sulfur from heavy sour crude.

“The market took them down along with everyone else but once the pressure came off a little bit they bounced right back,” said Nelder. “As soon as this stuff wrings out a little bit I think they are going to jump.”

Speculative Effect

Fadel Gheit, senior energy analyst at Oppenheimer, says he was also concerned with what he sees as intense speculation in energy stocks on the part of hedge funds and big investment banks.

As crude oil profit margins narrowed dramatically in late July due to rising crude prices and lower fuel prices, the analyst warned clients to expect increasing volatility.

“We are concerned that unwinding hedge positions by financial institutions in the next few weeks could create a selling stampede,” he wrote in a July 30 note, saying “excessive speculation” has exacerbated deteriorating margins.

A week later, Gheit downgraded the entire oil and gas sector — more than 20 stocks — to “neutral” from a previous rating of “buy.”

“We sent a warning signal two weeks ago to pull the plug on everyone,” Gheit said in a recent phone interview. “The industry fundamentals in our view have weakened and the inventory consumption is really weaker than what it appears to be.”

In the current environment, the analyst contends, big banks such as Goldman Sachs have more to do with oil prices than the oil companies themselves.

“There’s tremendous speculation by not only hedge funds but by financial institutions, which have much more money to play with and have more access to information,” he said.

Nevertheless, Gheit says he is still unquestionably bullish on energy companies’ long-term outlook.

“The world does not run without energy, we will need every source of energy we can get our hands on, but the low-hanging fruit has been picked,” he said. “Ninety percent of the people in the market today are short-term oriented, they want instant gratification. That’s not investing.”

Peter Kang is a markets writer at CNBC.com and can be reached at peter.kang@nbcuni.com.

Daily Show on the history of U.S. foreign relations

August 23, 2007 at 2:40 pm
Contributed by:

Folks,

I had to pass along a tip regarding last night’s Daily Show.

Quoting SilentPatriot at Crooksandliars:

In perhaps the most brilliant segment on “The Daily Show” I’ve ever seen, last night Jon ran through the last three decades of United States intervention in the Middle East to show how incoherent, ass-backwards and counter-productive it has been.

I agree–it was brilliant. And included the 1994 Cheney video.

Find it on the Comedy Central site by scrolling down the Most Recent Videos column to “America to the Rescue,” or find it on Crooksandliars here.

–C

Frank Zappa commercial for the Portland utility

August 23, 2007 at 10:20 am
Contributed by:

Passing this along just for fun, because I’m both an energy geek and a Zappa fan. I haven’t ever come across this before, but it’s a short TV commercial that Zappa did for the Portland utility company. Gotta love it.

Download it here

–C

Don’t Fear the Reaper

August 18, 2007 at 9:08 am
Contributed by:

Folks,

In this week’s Energy and Capital article, I assess the recent correction in the stock market and what it means for renewable energy investors…with a nod to Blue Oyster Cult.

–C

Don’t Fear the Reaper

Correction Just A Buying Opportunity for Renewable Energy

2007-08-17

By Chris Nelder

All our times have come

Here but now they’re gone

Seasons don’t fear the reaper

Nor do the wind, the sun or the rain

We can be like they are

–Blue Oyster Cult, "Don’t Fear the Reaper"

That B.O.C classic was my theme song for this week, and for more reasons than the "reaper" part.

From the dizzying record heights of Dow 14,000 and $78.77 crude, the markets and commodities have all given back about 10%.

But this is nothing to fear. In fact, I think we should welcome it.

As my trading sensei often reminds me, "No tree grows to the sky." Healthy markets must "correct" every so often, to moderate growth and make sure that prices don’t get too far ahead of value.

Or, as our macro trends guru, Justice Litle said to me yesterday, "the nature of booms and busts are such that Wall Street always, always overshoots whenever given the opportunity. Its a function of market logistics and human nature."

And we had overshot, big time, in a few areas.

This correction just brings the Dow back to its 200-day line.

And the cooling off of housing valuations-which ultimately led to the subprime mortgage mess we’re now trying to unwind-only brings housing appreciation back into its normal trendline, after three (and some would say ten) years of excessive appreciation:

nelder1
Now, I don’t mean to minimize the pain out there. I’ve taken my own lumps in the last few weeks, even taking some losses playing the short side, as the market veered crazily from one extreme to another. It’s tough to make a buck when the market has gone loco.

But we really needed to work those "toxic" loans out of the system. We really needed the hedge funds and big banks to cool their jets a little. (And it ain’t over yet.)

I daresay we even needed a chance to take some profits in the energy sector, because the growth has been nothing short of amazing for about three years running now. This correction only brought my personal fossil-fuel fave, Valero, back to its 200 day line:

nelder2

So, while the pain out there is real, and those who have profited the most egregiously (the banking and housing sectors) are now getting the worst whippings, we could also look at this as simply taking our medicine

To that extent, I think the Fed was right not to lower rates at this point and just let the system do its thing.

Meltdown? What Meltdown?

But in the midst of this carnage-as always!–there have been a few bright spots, and there were more than a few in the renewable energy sector.

While the major averages and the highest flying stocks got taken down 10% or better, some of our quiet little darlings rose against the tide, and ended this four-week correction period somewhere between holding up and jumping up!

That’s whatcha call strength, baby. Staying power.

In fact, today I’m going to show you a winner in every single segment of renewable energy.

Take a look at these charts, all starting on July 19th, the day the Dow hit its record 14,000 high, as compared to performance of the S&P 500 index.

First, one of my personal favorites in the geothermal sector, Raser Technologies:

nelder3

Next, another great geothermal play, Ormat Technologies:

nelder4

Or one I mentioned a few weeks ago, the solar/advanced battery/hydrogen/just-about-everything-RE company, Energy Conversion Devices:

nelder5

Or SunOpta, the grains processor, which is a play on both grains and ethanol:

nelder6

Or Calgon Carbon Corporation, a play on carbon sequestration and air and water purification:

nelder7

And finally, a winner in wind:

nelder8

Now admittedly, those are cherry-picked winners. The renewable energy sector was hardly immune to the broad market selloff this past month.

But even the corrections received by the better plays in RE were, again, merely a return to somewhat more reasonable valuations. Let’s look at a couple of one-year charts, with their 50- and 200-day moving averages, compared to the S&P 500.

Take a look at Gamesa SA, the second-largest wind turbine maker in the world (after GE). It came off a peak with everything else, but only returned to its 50-day line…still sporting about a 75% gain over the last year:

nelder9

Or have a look at the poster child of solar power stocks, First Solar. Again, it’s now just barely below its 50-day line, with less than a year’s history, and it’s still up over 250%:

nelder10

So enough with the crocodile tears. We’re sitting pretty on some gains here in the renewable energy sector, and this correction only gives us a chance to catch a decent entry point for a change, without feeling like we’re chasing a runaway train.

In fact I hope my editor doesn’t cut some of these exemplary stocks out, because I just showed you a couple of the best gems in the Green Chip Stocks collection. (But of course, there are many more.) To gain access to them, click here .

The boom in energy is hardly over. It’s just catching its breath. So don’t fear the reaper. Just relax, sit back, wait for the dust to settle, and then take that opportunity to jump on the train before it gets rolling again. Next stop: Profit Junction.

Until next time,

chris

Chris

Market Meltdown and Another Guest Appearance

August 15, 2007 at 4:10 pm
Contributed by: Chris

Folks,

If you follow the markets, you are more than aware that they have been melting down for the last three weeks, with the Dow crashing hundreds of points in a day. For those of us who trade stocks, it’s been a very volatile time, with fear and greed hashing it out big-time.

The cause of all this was the “sudden” realization that a huge number of adjustable rate mortgages out there were sold to people with poor credit, and that many of those mortgages are about to have their interest rates raised, leading to a large number of defaults. This in turn caused the rapid devaluation of many other investing vehicles which were levered to those loans, which in turn has sharply devalued the businesses of some of the biggest banks on Wall Street, and caused carnage in the hedge fund world (like, losing 60% of their portfolio values).

I won’t try to get into more detail than that here–there is plenty to read elsewhere on the subject written by more knowledgeable observers–but I’ll give you my bottom line, based on my research: The economy is in trouble, banks are in trouble, there’s not a whole lot that the Fed can do about it, and it is going to take a while to unwind…not days or weeks, but months or even years.

Consequently, I have unloaded almost all my long positions and gotten short via ETFs: SKF and SRS. I believe that this is a good time to be in cash or in a defensive posture. But the markets have been extremely volatile and irrational. There has already been a rally since the first selloff two weeks ago–when the Dow and oil had both reached record highs–but it has been a classic “dead cat bounce” and more than a few investors (like myself) swooped in on an apparent buying opportunity, only to get stopped out of those positions a day or a week later.

Danger, Will Robinson, Danger!

That’s about all I’ll say on the markets right now.

Moving on…I feel compelled to comment on the announced resignation of “Hot” Karl Rove, since he’s been a regular whipping boy in these pages, but I’m not sure what to say. In a sense, I think I felt safer knowing approximately where he was and what he was doing. Who knows what his next trick will be? But of this I’m sure: he’s not going anywhere. I have no doubt that he will continue to work on Republican campaigns and do everything he can to divide and conquer America by actively destroying its social fabric, pitting us against each other in order to scrape a few more votes his way. Just for grins, feel free to email me your best guess at Rove’s next gig.

Finally, I did a short (~6 minute) guest appearance at the daily online podcast The Real Story with Aaron Task today. Check it out here (”No Shelter From the Selling”). My bit starts around 27:00.

Keep your powder dry and your stops tight, and good luck everybody!

–C

Peak Oil Hits the Third World

August 10, 2007 at 3:23 pm
Contributed by:

Folks,

In this week’s article for Energy and Capital, I review some recent news reports from around the world, and the toll that high fuel prices are taking on the poorer parts of the world. One of my editors called it “pretty heavy” and another said “Scary article. Wait till the poor in America’s inner cities can no longer afford heat in the winter or A/C in the summer. I’m expecting riots.”

I hope it doesn’t come to that any time soon. But there is certainly cause for vigilance. What is happening in the Third World today will likely happen in the First World in a few short years.

–C

Peak Oil Hits the Third World

2007-08-10

By Chris Nelder

Sometimes it takes a strong stomach to weather the ups and downs of the market, and this last two weeks was one of those times.

Crude oil reached a new all-time high of $78.77, then promptly fell 8%, taking most of the energy complex down with it.

Does this mean peak oil fears are overblown? Does it mean we’re headed back to $60 oil?

Not likely.

What we saw in the last week has more to do with the sub-prime mortgage meltdown than anything else. It put the fear of freefall into fund traders, causing them to sell perfectly good stocks indiscriminately–especially perfectly good energy stocks, where they were sitting on some nice gains–in order to raise cash. It also gave a sell signal to oil futures traders, who had built up a record level of long positions.

In other words, it was the blowing off of some speculative froth, and little more.

The true bottom line on energy is quite another matter.

Douglas Low, the director of the Oil Depletion Analysis Centre in Britain, recently warned of a "crisis coming up" with real shortages of oil, noting that the world used 1.5 mbpd more crude than it produced in June. "It’s not a very happy message," he says. "A lot of people want to slip it under the carpet."

Indeed. Like all the cheap oil cheerleaders who used this occasion to predict that oil was going back to $40 or (snort) $20.

I would like to refer those Pollyannas to a little-noticed opinion essay published two days ago by the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell, one of the world’s largest oil companies. Jeroen van der Veer laid out his "Three Hard Truths About the World’s Energy Crisis":

The first hard truth is that demand is accelerating.

The second hard truth is that the growth rate of supplies of "easy oil," conventional oil and natural gas that are relatively easy to extract, will struggle to keep up with demand.

The third hard truth is that increased use of coal will cause higher carbon dioxide emissions possibly to levels we deem unacceptable.

I’m not sure what motivated Mr. van der Veer to make such a bold statement. Since his prime directive is to maximize shareholder value, he must feel that it’s time to take a defensive position and get out in front of the peak oil story, now that the recent reports from the IEA and the National Petroleum Council have confirmed the basic message that supply is struggling to keep up with demand.

Indeed, given this year’s worldwide tapering off of exports, and worse news for our imports, some of those chickens seem to be nestled into the roost already. Mexico, the world’s number-five producer, and our number-four source of imported crude (accounting for 11% of our imports), admitted two weeks ago that its oil reserves will be done, kaput, in just seven years.

I’ve been watching and waiting for these signs for about five years now: Not just high prices and declining exports, but the slowing of commerce, interstate trucking and air travel, food shortages and similar indications.

But the actual feeling of peak oil didn’t really hit me until this week, as I perused a page on Jim Kingsdale’s excellent Energy Investment Strategies site, listing countries that are currently experiencing serious fuel shortages and grid blackouts.

Here in the first world, we still have the luxury of armchair theorizing about peak oil, and paying a bit more for gasoline, but the third world is actually feeling the pain of peak oil today. Rising oil prices are acting as a regressive worldwide tax, pricing poorer countries right out of the market.

Since their experience must to some extent herald ours as peak sets in, let’s see how peak oil feels to those who are undergoing it firsthand.

Asia and Middle East

Nepal: Gasoline and diesel shortages are crippling the country. In July, the Kathmandu valley was hit with its worst energy crisis in history as the state-owned petroleum importer and distributor stopped supplies to gas stations entirely. Fuming taxi drivers subsequently parked their cars before the heart of the Nepalese government center to protest the shortfall. The Nepal Oil Company (NOC) has been facing cuts from its sole supplier, the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), because of mounting debts owing to Nepal’s subsidies, which force NOC to sell fuel below cost.

Pakistan: Chronic power shortages have led to riots in the streets in Karachi. At one point this summer, the gap between supply and demand reached a peak of 3,000 megawatts (MW). Due to chronic underinvestment in energy infrastructure, the country’s Planning Commission estimates that its shortfall in oil supply will grow to 3.2 million tons of oil equivalent (TOE) in 2010, and 21.5 TOE in 2020.

Iraq: Iraq has suffered from an acute shortage of oil products since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. This week brought a report that Iraq’s electricity grid could collapse any day now, due to sabotage, rising demand, fuel shortages, and provincial officials who are disconnecting their local power stations from the national grid (presumably in the interest of self-preservation). Constant attacks on pipelines have made it impossible for Iraq to meet its internal need for gasoline, forcing it to rely on imports to the tune of 1.3 million gallons per day. At the same time, it is being forced to reduce subsidies on gasoline in order to meet IMF debt-reduction requirements, even as it struggles with 60% unemployment and rampant poverty as well as chronic grid blackouts. Oil smuggling and a robust black market have sprung up to take advantage of an estimated 10x spread between the official subsidized prices and black market rates.

Iran: Chronic gasoline shortages have forced the government to impose rationing. Motorists can buy only 100 liters a month at the subsidized price of 1,000 riyals (about 11 cents) a liter (the cheapest gasoline in the world). Iran’s program of oil subsidies–combined with sanctions from the West over its nuclear intentions–has proved disastrous, putting the government in an intense budgetary squeeze. Angry protesters torched 19 gas stations in response to the rationing in late June. Tehran currently imports about half of its gasoline, and absorbs a loss of nearly $2 per gallon on it, creating an intense drain on the national coffers. As in Iraq, rationing is expected to lead to a brisk black market.

Bangladesh: The shortage of electricity is acute, to the tune of about 2,000 MW a day, which is resulting in regular blackouts. Bangladesh’s attempts to import electricity from India, Nepal and Bhutan have been fruitless, so in June the country obtained permission from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to begin building nuclear power plants.

Sri Lanka: Severe shortages of fuel have led the UN to warn the government that it may not be able to continue providing humanitarian aid or preserve its supply of vaccines and essential medicines. The UN agencies have been forced to curtail the usage of generators and vehicles. Construction activity in the Jaffna and Wanni regions has all but ceased due to the lack of fuel.

Philippines: A deadly tropical storm hit the country this week, bringing an end to a three-month drought that had severely reduced the country’s electricity output. Extremely low water levels were recorded at five major hydroelectric power dams, one of which was forced to shut down entirely. The shortage caused sporadic electricity outages in the country’s capital of Manila, which turned to coal and oil-fired power plants to make up the difference.

China: A red-hot economy with rapidly growing industrial sectors has put China in a constant state of electricity shortages, with brownouts a common occurrence. Shortages of coal, power and oil have been reported. Top refiner Sinopec has stopped selling refined products to other companies and private filling stations in order to maintain supply to its own outlets, and some oil dealers are suspected of hoarding supplies. Now the world’s second largest energy consumer (behind the U.S.), China’s total energy consumption has risen by an average of more than 11% each year for the last five years, 70% to 80% of which is supplied by coal. Meanwhile, all of that coal is casting a shadow of soot around the world, dropping it in places like the west coast of the U.S., and causing acid rain that poisons lakes, rivers, forests and crops. It has been estimated that fully 77% of the black carbon emitted into North America’s lower atmosphere comes from Asia.

India: Soaring temperatures as high as 122° F have caused hundreds of deaths and raised grid demand to a record 4,000 MW in the capital of New Delhi, where rolling blackouts and equipment failures have caused power outages lasting up to 15 hours a day. Chronic power shortages in urban and rural India are crippling industrial and agricultural productivity and discouraging foreign investment. The country is currently looking to nuclear energy to provide some relief.

Vietnam: Another red-hot Asian economy with electricity consumption growing at the rate of 15% to 20% annually, Vietnam is facing a 1,000 megawatt shortfall in peak power production. The capitol has ordered local governments to keep the thermostats set no lower than 77° F and to turn off air conditioners a half-hour before the end of the day–with a $1,250 fine for non-compliance.

Africa

Some 25 of the 44 sub-Saharan nations are facing "unprecedented" and crippling electricity shortages with common power outages, even in South Africa. In Nigeria, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Ghana and other parts of West Africa, drought has slashed the generating capacity of hydroelectric dams, which is in turn crippling production of gold, aluminum, and other basic metals.

Uganda: Electricity shortages are frequent as the grid is strained beyond capacity, largely because drought has lowered the water level of the Nile River, reducing hydroelectric generation. Parts of the capital are blacked out for as much as a day at a time. The country has leased two 50-megawatt diesel-burning generators to compensate, reportedly costing the nation about as much as it would have cost to build two new hydroelectric dams. And in a horribly ironic twist, grid power shortages are shutting down a pipeline from Kenya, adding to the diesel shortages.

Zimbabwe: Critical gasoline and diesel shortages are ruining the economy, pushing the price of a liter of petrol to a staggering 120,000 Zimbabwe dollars. Fuel stations went completely dry in June, and there have been long queues at the few which had any to sell.

Ghana: Electricity shortages are causing load shedding blackouts, costing the economy on the order of US $5 million a day. Ghana, among others, has compensated by leasing huge gas generators to produce emergency power–at exorbitant rates.

Nigeria: An acute shortage of fuel occurred in June due to strikes by unionized oil labor over wages, a hike in fuel prices, and the sale of two refineries. Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has vowed to cripple the government of Oyo State if it makes good on its threat to eliminate some of the state work force. Abductions, killings and robberies have plunged the oil-producing parts of the country into chaos. Only 19 of 79 power plants even work, and blackouts are costing the economy $1 billion a year. In Nigeria, Angola and other nations, most businesses and many residents run private generators because the grid is so unreliable, adding to their economic and air pollution woes. Imagine: "I’ve been on the 20th floor of an apartment building in Luanda, and there would be generators on all the verandas, with the racket, the fumes."

Senegal: State power company Senelec has been unable to pay for supplies of fuel for its oil-fired power stations, leading to cuts in electricity supply. China has come to its rescue with a 370 million yuan loan to fund a new distribution network, in addition to its commitment to build a 250 megawatt coal-fired power station there.

Kenya: Gasoline and diesel shortages in Nairobi are grounding industrial and personal transport alike, and price hikes appear likely.

Gambia: Shortages of gasoline and diesel are taking an economic toll across the country, with many empty petrol stations and long lines at stations that have fuel to sell–but only to customers holding coupons from Shell.

Americas

Argentina: The country is facing its worst energy shortage in nearly 20 years. An increase in heating demand caused by an unseasonably early cold snap, combined with the failure of a power plant, caused the collapse of both the power grid and the fuel supply system. Electricity supplies have been severely curtailed, plunging entire districts into darkness and causing the layoff of industrial workers. Shortages of compressed natural gas, which powers many Argentine cars and 90% of the capital’s taxis, are common. Argentina now has less than ten years’ worth of gas reserves, and can no longer meet peak electricity demand.

Nicaragua: Electricity shortages have led to widespread blackouts, prompting the recently re-elected president Daniel Ortega to promise an end to the "energy bankruptcy" that has afflicted the country. The nation’s energy deficit is running between 20% and 30%, forcing the power-distribution company Unión Fenosa to shut down whole cities for six to ten hours at a time. Ortega announced that nations such as Iran would help to build new energy plants to address the issue.

Chile: Reduced supplies of natural gas and lower-than-average rainfall have pushed electricity spot prices to record highs, prompting concerns of inflation and reduced valuations of the country’s energy companies. The market took Chile’s third-biggest power generator, Colbun SA (COLBUN CC), to the woodshed in early July.

Costa Rica: Beginning in April, Costa Rica began experiencing nationwide electricity blackouts, forcing emergency rationing. The country’s hydroelectric capacity is strained to the max, due to a dry summer cutting power output by 25%, damaged turbines at oil-burning thermal plants, and Panama’s decision to stop exporting electricity to Costa Rica. Blackouts are now routinely scheduled.

Dominican Republic: Electricity blackouts have become commonplace, apparently due to a lack of fuel and regular maintenance of power plants. Programmed blackouts have now spread from the barrio neighborhoods to the exclusive residential districts.

The picture is clear: the poor and undeveloped countries of the world are the first to fall before the remorseless price inflation brought by peak oil.

Claude Mandil, the head of the International Energy Agency, warned recently of a "catastrophe" for the world’s poorest countries as they are forced into the suicidal practice of subsidizing oil just to keep their economies running.

Since we know that there is little point in trying to radically increase anyone’s supply of oil, gas or coal at this point, there are only two paths left to choose: powering down or going renewable.

You know what our preference is. Who can turn his back on industries that are growing at the rate of 25%+ a year? While aging oil companies struggle to suck "the last days of ancient sunlight" from the ground, warily eyeing their incipient declines, there are young, agile companies eyeing the abundant and untapped solar, wind, geothermal and wave potential in most of the above countries–with the eager support of the World Bank and the IMF.

Oh, and us profit-seekers over here at Green Chip Stocks.

Until next time,

Chris signature

–Chris

Interview on the Ken Brown radio show

August 9, 2007 at 10:56 am
Contributed by: Chris

Folks,

I did another interview on Ken Brown’s show on Wednesday. We discussed recent action in the markets, the situation with oil and renewables, and the energy legislation that was recently passed in the House.

You can download it here (33 mins, 84 MB).

–C

Three Hard Truths About the World’s Energy Crisis

August 7, 2007 at 5:18 pm
Contributed by:

Folks,

This recent opinion piece from the CEO of Shell deserves wider circulation, so I’m re-posting it here (boldface mine). Although van der Veer has been much more forthcoming about the reality of energy supplies than the rest of his Big Oil peers (when are the rest of the big oil majors going to own up to their own exaggerated reserve estimates, like Shell did?), this is remarkably straight-shootin’ stuff.

When the CEO of one of the world’s largest oil companies says that supply is going to have to struggle to keep up with demand, you can take it to the bank.

–C

Three Hard Truths About the World’s Energy Crisis


Source: East African Standard (Nairobi)

OPINION

7 August 2007

Posted to the web 6 August 2007

By Jeroen Van Der Veer

Nairobi

When it comes to the future of energy, the world needs a reality check.

Contrary to public perception, renewable energy is not
the silver bullet that will solve all our problems. Indeed, in the decades
ahead, three hard truths will generate turbulence in the global energy system.

We all know that global demand for energy is growing, but
the reality of how fast has not really sunk in. The first hard truth is that
demand is accelerating
. Energy use in 2050 may be twice as high as it is today
or higher still. The main causes are population growth, from six to more than
nine billion, and higher levels of prosperity.

China and India are entering the energy-intensive phase
of their development. This is the point when people buy their first television
set or car, board a plane for the first time and start to consume much more
transport fuel and electricity.

And most people in China and India have never boarded a
plane! The pace of change is startling. Last year, China enlarged its
electricity capacity by roughly the equivalent of Great Britain’s entire stock
of power stations.

The second hard truth is that the growth rate of supplies
of ‘easy oil’, conventional oil and natural gas that are relatively easy to
extract, will struggle to keep up with demand.

Just when energy demand is surging, many of the world’s
conventional oilfields are going into decline. The problem is not the
availability of resources as such. Overall, the International Energy Agency
believes that there could be roughly 20 trillion barrels oil equivalent of oil
and natural gas in place.

This includes conventional and unconventional resources,
such as oil shale and sands. In theory, this is enough to keep us going for
about 400 years at the current rate of consumption.

Carbon emissions unacceptable

In practice, though, less than half can be recovered with
existing technology. The world now produces 135 million barrels oil equivalent a
day of oil and natural gas. We could still raise that number with new
technologies, but only gradually and certainly not indefinitely.

The third hard truth is that increased use of coal will
cause higher carbon dioxide emissions possibly to levels we deem unacceptable.

The IEA believes that coal use could grow by around 60 per cent in the next 20
years.

The main reason that countries turn to coal is energy
security. China and India will continue to exploit their domestic coal reserves
to be less dependent on oil and gas imports. So will the US, which now generates
more than half its electricity with coal.

But burning coal for electricity generates twice as much
carbon dioxide as burning natural gas. Gasifying coal, instead of burning it,
reduces emissions, but still this is not enough to solve the problem.

In our battle against greenhouse gas emissions, taking
the carbon dioxide out of fossil fuels, especially coal, is crucial. It will be
a huge challenge: To keep greenhouse gases in the atmosphere well below 550
parts a million, the upper most bound of where science tells us we should be.

Shell works with models that assume carbon capture and
storage is installed at 90 per cent of all the coal and gas-fired power plants
in the rich countries by the year 2050, and at 50 per cent in non-OECD
countries.

Time is short: It will take a decade to test the
technology in pilot projects before we can move to larger-scale projects. So
what about renewables such as wind and solar energy?

The share of renewables in the global energy mix could go
up from its low base of about one per cent to about 30 per cent by the middle of
the century. The number of wind turbines, for instance, may grow from about
30,000 today to one million and their capacity will be significantly larger than
the ones we have built.

This assumes that the hunt for technological
breakthroughs to make renewables cheaper will be successful. But even then,
fossil energy will still make up most of the remaining 70 per cent.

However, this is out of sync with what opinion polls show
that most Americans and Europeans believe that renewable energy will have
replaced most fossil energy by 2050. As the hard truths make clear, this simply
is not going to happen.

That is why energy efficiency is important. More than
half the energy we generate every day is wasted. In an average car, about 20 per
cent of every unit of petrol goes into moving a car forward, the rest is lost as
heat.

For an aircraft during take-off, the figure is eight per
cent. Only 35 per cent of burnt coal in a power plant becomes electricity, the
rest is lost as heat. What is the point of producing more energy if we continue
to waste most of it?

Instead, we should aim to become twice as efficient in
our use of energy by the middle of the century. That is entirely feasible,
provided that the will is there.

The world’s energy system is entering a turbulent phase,
and the only question is: How turbulent? A unified world could respond more
effectively than a fragmented one.

The writer is the Royal Dutch Shell Plc CEO

The Renewables Revolution Will Not Be Televised

August 4, 2007 at 10:38 am
Contributed by:

Folks,

For this week’s Energy and Capital column, I adapted the famous poem by Gil Scott-Heron to discuss renewable energy.

–C

The Renewables Revolution Will Not Be Televised

2007-08-03

By Chris Nelder

You will not be able to stay home, brother.

You will not be able to plug in, turn on and cop out.

You will not be able to lose yourself on skag and

Skip out for beer during commercials,

Because the revolution will not be televised

–Gil Scott-Heron, "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised"

Gil Scott-Heron’s 1970 classic poem about race relations could just as easily be about the renewable energy revolution that is now well underway.

To be sure, there have been some recent moments when the media turned its focus on energy. Like when President Bush proclaimed that we are "addicted to oil."

Or like this week, with a slew of energy legislation making its way to the floor of Congress. Among the bills are some important ones that would set higher gas mileage standards for vehicles and establish a federal renewable portfolio standard (RPS) for generating of renewable energy. Some of them may even be voted on today.

But I resisted the urge to write about them, and exhort you to call your Congressmen in support. Why?

Because the renewables revolution will not be televised.

You will not be able to stay at home, flipping the channels

For the latest on Paris, Nicole and Lindsay

While Big Oil finds another five new Saudi Arabias’ worth

Of the lifeblood you need to get to your job 50 miles away.

No blow-dried air personality is going to ask you not to buy a Hummer 2

Or question whether you really need to "conquer the road"

No contractor will ask you if you really need 15,000 square feet of house

No oil sheik will ask you why you still drive something that gets 14 mpg

The renewables revolution will not be televised.

No senator is going to tell you when to install solar

No utility company is going to help you eliminate your electric bill

No automaker is going to urge a new era in electric light rail

Nobody is going to tell you when to jump and go build a lifeboat

Because the oil-based infrastructure is breaking down.

The renewables revolution will not be televised.

The renewables revolution will not be planned from the top down

Congress will not come up with a wise and sustainable energy policy

The renewables revolution will not have the unequivocal support of the Department of Energy

Economists, stock traders and energy analysts will not

Line up to promote it on the Sunday news shows

Because the renewables revolution will not be televised.

Geothermal turbines will not be featured on Kudlow & Company

Jim Cramer will not tell you to reduce your personal energy footprint

Dick Cheney will not tell you to follow his example

And build a state-of-the-art energy efficient home with solar power

Al Gore will not give you a step-by-step instruction manual

On how to be a smart energy consumer.

Ahnold will not come to your house to pump it up with free energy

Your conservation will not earn you air miles or discount coupons

Your insurance company will not reward you for biking instead of driving

New insulation will not increase the curb appeal of your home

Or get it on the five o’clock news

The renewables revolution will not be televised.

The renewables revolution will not attract more business to your state

It will not feel like a reaction to 9/11

Even though it is a more effective response than military action.

News choppers will not circle your home

Broadcasting pictures of your solar system, your garden and your hybrid

Because that does not make news like a refinery explosion does

The renewables revolution will not be televised.

No one is driving the bus you’re on, brother

No one is going to guarantee that you will always be able to buy

Food from halfway ’round the world because you have the money

Money won’t be where it’s at, honey

When the oil runs out

The renewables revolution will not be televised.

No, my brothers and sisters, the renewables revolution will not be televised

The revolution will begin at home, with you and your neighbors

You will buy local organic food simply because it tastes better

Because it is free of "potentially cancer-causing agents"

And because you like to support the local economy.

You will turn off unneeded lights simply as a sign of respect

You will relocate so you can walk or bike to work

Because it makes your life better.

You will install wind turbines and solar panels and micro-hydro turbines and geothermal heat pumps

Because you like knowing that your energy is clean and green

Because you don’t want your children to breathe power plant exhaust

Because you want a healthy environment for all of God’s creatures

And because it’s cheaper in the long run.

The revolution will be do-it-yourself

The revolution will be your personal decision

The revolution will be bottom-up

The revolution will be demanded by the grassroots and forced upon big business

The revolution will challenge the status quo.

But no one will sell it to you, brother.

It will not be brought to you by ExxonMobil

It will not add 20 points to your IQ, six years to your life, or three inches to your unit

It will not clear up your skin, remove your wrinkles, or cure your psoriasis

It will not make you the most popular person in the office

Or the envy of the block.

The renewables revolution will be in your house, on your time, and on your dime.

The renewables revolution will be live.

And you can profit from it here !

Until next time,

–Chris


Page 1 of 212»


Copyright © 2008 GetRealList
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
FAIR USE NOTICE